The censorship by Twitter is a breach of constitutional rights

Started by AribertDeckers, August 02, 2023, 03:09:44 PM

AribertDeckers

The censorship by Twitter is a breach of constitutional rights
2.8.2023


https://twitter.com/LoofboroDan/status/1686567714284838913

[*quote*]
Dan Loofboro @LoofboroDan

Oh you better be worried about the anti vaccine movement. VERY WORRIED. I saw Paul Offit shaking in his boots talking about it.

Us anti vaxxers are just getting started. Every day I am talking to people waking Pharma up to what Pharma really is.

And we are getting organised.

Tick Tock pharma. Tick Tock
4:40 AM · Aug 2, 2023
 from Kettering, OH
32.7K Views 2 Retweets 2 Quotes 34  Likes 1 Bookmark
[*/quote*]


The march of the morons, yes, heard of it.


AribertDeckers

In case this account on Twitter disappears, you now know why



https://x.com/aribertdeckers/status/1795222208601534911

[*quote*]
Aribert Deckers @aribertdeckers

Isn't embarrassing, that the multi-billionaire Elon Musk uses porn bots to harass users in his "social media" play-toy?
How can he claim to use AI in his company, when that AI is even too stupid to recognize shitty stupid porn bots?
WHAT THE HELL IS GOING ON HERE!?

12:35 AM · May 28, 2024
[*/quote*]


Now he knows that I know that he knows.

And now you know.

AribertDeckers

Someone makes a tweet. But Twitter does not pass it on. Twitter even does not pass on the tweet to the person this tweet is addressed to. This is censorship.

I now found an explicit piece of proof: a tweet I made on 2nd. May, 2023. On 3rd. August 2024 this tweet got a LIKE by an other person. The counter for the views showed: "1".

This means that on 3rd. August 2024 the tweet was shown to a user for the first time ever. After 14 months!


Linda Yaccarino @lindayaX, the CEO of Twitter (claimed to be "X"), on 6th. August 2024 wrote "An open letter to advertisers". In it she claims:

https://x.com/lindayaX/status/1820838134470328676

[*quote*]
An open letter to advertisers

Every day, hundreds of millions of people come to X to be part of the only global, real-time conversation. They come to share their thoughts and hear others. To share their content and see more. To debate and be debated. To entertain and be entertained. To inspire and be inspired. There is no substitute for X.


The power of this community to bring global conversations to life was the reason I was so excited to join X as CEO in June 2023.

After a career in media and advertising, I thought I had seen everything. Then I read the U.S. House of Representatives Judiciary Committee's report entitled "GARM's (Global Alliance for Responsible Media) Harm" last month. The report disclosed that their investigation had found evidence of an illegal boycott against many companies, including X.

As their report found: "Evidence obtained by the Committee shows that GARM and its members directly organized boycotts and used other indirect tactics to target disfavored platforms, content creators, and news organizations in an effort to demonetize and, in effect, limit certain choices for consumers."
The consequence - perhaps the intent - of this boycott was to seek to deprive X's users, be they sports fans, gamers, journalists, activists, parents or political and corporate leaders, of the Global Town Square.
To put it simply, people are hurt when the marketplace of ideas is undermined and some viewpoints are not funded over others as part of an illegal boycott.
This behavior is a stain on a great industry, and cannot be allowed to continue.
That is why, today, X has filed an antitrust lawsuit against the Global Alliance for Responsible Media (GARM), the World Federation of Advertisers (WFA), and GARM members CVS Health, Mars, Orsted and Unilever. This is not a decision we took lightly, but it is a direct consequence of their actions.
The illegal behavior of these organizations and their executives cost X billions of dollars.
Since arriving at X, I made it my mission to continue to build a platform where people, brands and advertisers can thrive in our unique, dynamic and safe environment.
And because of this commitment to our users, even despite the boycott, usage has reached all time highs. Using a Twitter legacy metric, user active minutes, in August 2022, people spent 7.2 billion active minutes on the platform. Today, that number is more than 9 billion, a 25% increase.
The same is true for video - even compared to last year, daily video views are up 45% to 8.2 billion. X is innovating and growing.
We have met and surpassed the requests made by advertisers and groups such as GARM for new tools, both to improve advertiser controls and the effectiveness of our products to drive increased value for our customers.
We have proven our platform provides advertisers a way to showcase their brands and reach their target audiences safely, efficiently and effectively. That's why I've worked in good faith with marketers across the globe to showcase our innovations and allay any concerns with brands whom I've partnered with for decades. The unfortunate reality is that despite all our efforts, hundreds of meetings and research to the contrary, many companies chose to dismiss the facts.
To those who broke the law, we say enough is enough. We are compelled to seek justice for the harm that has been done by these and potentially additional defendants, depending what the legal process reveals.
It's also clear that there are likely others who suffered at the hands of this activity. This case is about more than damages - we have to fix a broken ecosystem that allows this illegal activity to occur.
We will continue to innovate and ensure X has a vibrant future while the courts will hold accountable those who engaged in illegal behavior.
To all of you who have been part of the transformative journey we are on, thank you. Rest assured, we will not stop defending our global town square.
Linda
[*/quote*]


I say: She is a rotten liar.

She claims:

"Every day, hundreds of millions of people come to X to be part of the only global, real-time conversation."

"real-time" !? When in 14 months a tweet is shown to nobody at all?

Elon Musk and his CEO claim THIS to be real-time? Even claiming to be the Emperor of China would make more sense than this outrageous lie.






https://x.com/ThomasKnorra/status/1650044090073993216

[*quote*]
Thomas Knorra 😷🌍 @ThomasKnorra
Apr 23, 2023

Habt Ihr auch den Eindruck, dass sozial- und umweltpolitische Themen auf Twitter an Reichweite eingebüßt haben? Dass entsprechende Tweets weniger gesehen und in der Folge weniger geteilt werden?

9:49 AM · Apr 23, 2023
6,871 Views
[*/quote*]


https://x.com/aribertdeckers/status/1653185337907093511

[*quote*]
Aribert Deckers @aribertdeckers

Twitter als aktives Zwischenglied gibt die Tweets einfach nicht mehr weiter. DAS ist die Ursache.

Facebook hat schon vor Jahren zugegeben, so etwas zu machen. Es sei eine "Moderation" um Extremisten zu bremsen.

Wahr ist: Es ist ein Verstoß gegen die US-Verfassung.


1:51 AM · May 2, 2023
1 View
[*/quote*]



AribertDeckers

#3
14.10.2024

About 2 dozen "Elon Musk" bots follow me on Twitter. Today, one such a bot appeared, and then shortly thereafter, a second one.




I had written a negative comment on Donald Trump, the convicted criminal, who now is allowed to run for the presidency of the United States of America. So, an attack by Elon Musk's bots is something one can expect these days.

So I had some fun tweeting about that:


https://x.com/aribertdeckers/status/1845877173355249988

[*quote*]
Aribert Deckers @aribertdeckers

Oh, hey, two more Elon Musk bots follow me.

You know what? I give a damn about that.
For over 50 years I am followed by KGB, Stasi, Mossad, CIA, and even by the German MAD.
Life is that way. 😇😎

7:19 PM · Oct 14, 2024
19 Views
[*/quote*]


THEN the real fun began: This very tweet of mine was liked and retweeted:






But it was neither bot 1 nor bot 2, which followed me, that retweeted and liked, no, it was a third bot: